Return-Path: <adolf@ns.tio.com>
Received: from ns.tio.com (adolf@[207.211.39.1])	by tomcat.ns.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) 
with ESMTP id KAA21631	for <cpicket@ns.net>; Sun, 28 Dec 1997 10:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (adolf@localhost) by ns.tio.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) 
with SMTP id LAA25857 for <cpicket@ns.net>; Sun, 28 Dec 1997 11:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 11:13:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Adolf Chavez <adolf@ns.tio.com>
To: Chris Pickett <cpicket@ns.net>
Subject: Re: Email Spam: Email your AD to 57 MILLION People  ONLY $99 
In-Reply-To: <199712271749.JAA20365@tomcat.ns.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.971228110957.25802B-100000@ns.tio.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-UIDL: 60f973cf1925700f63bd3d566acaad29

No - tiocom doesn't enjoy being raped - and you're right -that's what it
felt like. We've implemented some filters to disallow relaying since this 
happened.

We hate spam as much or more than you - when it clogs our mail server with
thousands of messages. I'd like to get my hands around the neck of the guy
who did this. 

He does have a fax number - and I've considered sending a threatening fax
- but doubt it would do much good.

I contacted uu.net three times  - twice while he was connected to our mail
server. 

Adolf Chavez
Tiocom