Return-Path: <studio42@persipina.host4u.net>
Received: from dfw-smtpin2.email.verio.net ([129.250.38.52]) by          dfw-spool1.email.verio.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.1) with          ESMTP id FWSJFZ04.KXZ for <cpicket@ns.net>; Tue, 27 Jun 2000          02:11:59 +0000 
Received: from [216.71.64.59] (helo=persipina.host4u.net)	by dfw-smtpin2.email.verio.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #7)	id 136kr1-0000OX-00	for cpicket@ns.net; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:11:59 +0000
Received: (from studio42@localhost)	by persipina.host4u.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA25387	for cpicket@ns.net; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:11:52 -0500
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:11:52 -0500
Message-Id: <200006270211.VAA25387@persipina.host4u.net>
Reply-to: bozotheclown@mindspring.com ()
From: bozotheclown@mindspring.com ()
Subject: Entry to the Anti-Spam Guestbook

You have a new entry in your guestbook:

# Entered from spider-wl082.proxy.aol.com (205.188.199.57) with HTTP/1.0.
------------------------------------------------------
awesome site chris, mr.pickett that is.these spammers should be afraid since they never 
exactly know who they are playing with.keep up the good work. 
 <bozotheclown@mindspring.com>
 - Monday, June 26, 2000 at 21:11:51 (CDT)
------------------------------------------------------

Notice the attempt at intimidation by addressing me by name. This is a common tactic of spammers trying to make themselves look impressive and is really their only method of intimidation. Also, their bogus address confirms that this was left by a spammer who I must have smacked pretty hard or else the ISP forwarded my information to the spammer. So they did a whois lookup, good for them. It's still impolite to address ME directly on the guestbook. Then again, it's impolite to spam.