Return-Path: <cheron@fda.net>
Received: from mail.ixpres.com (mail.ixpres.com [207.137.28.4])	
by tomcat.ns.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA29439	for <cpicket@ns.net>; 
Mon, 12 Jan 1998 21:41:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cheron.fia.net ([209.144.107.144]) by mail.ixpres.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.01)  with SMTP id 276
          for <cpicket@ns.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 1998 09:43:26 -0800
Message-ID: <34BAFE97.96@fda.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 21:41:43 -0800
From: Cheri <cheron@fda.net>
Reply-To: cheron@fda.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Pickett <cpicket@ns.net>
Subject: Re: several messages
References: <199801130416.UAA15016@tomcat.ns.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: a3306ccded2f91f3ad44227e048ad71b

Chris, thanks so much for your response. It has been most helpful to me.
I had some real doubts about hitting the "reply to all" button on this
one, even though I am a private person and my intentions were honorable,
spam has become such a sensitive issue it's hard to know where the line
is drawn anymore.
Anyway, thanks again, and keep up the good fight.
Cheri

Chris Pickett wrote:
> 
> On 1/12/98 8:03 PM, Cheri sent the following ASCII stream:
> 
> >To all on this crazy spam list. That was nice of her to reply, usually I
> >don't hear anything, maybe a bot reply at best. So, how did I get on
> >these people's spam hit list to begin with? And how do I get off...any
> >ideas?
> >Thanks,
> >Signed fed-up with spam,
> >Cheron
> 
> Thanks for replying to the whole list.
> 
> First, you've been spammed, but you know that. You either did one or more
> of the following:
> 1. Posted to Usenet.
> 2. Have your email address on a web page.
> 3. Sent an email to a Juno member
> 4. You have internet access.
> 
> Spammers are notorious for harvesting addresses.
> 
> Want to fight spam? Be smart and more annoying than they are. I use to
> have a program that send 2 million emails an hour for 2 months, but
> apparently some spammers complained so I dismantled it.
> 
> Smart complaints and not putting up with their crap is the best way to
> fight this. I myself run an anti-spam site on my domain:
> http://www.studio42.com/kill-the-spam/
> 
> Swing by, you might learn something by accident. Overall, I've had a very
> good response to my site on my domain.
> 
> * Chris Pickett, owner of Studio42, Computer, Audio and Data Services *
> |Commercial and/or unsolicited email and/or spam will be processed for|
> |   a $500 handling fee. Unsolicited sending constitutes acceptance.  |
> [>>>--------> Studio42 web site: http://www.studio42.com  <--------<<<]