Return-Path: <abuse@ucla.edu>
Received: from theta2.ben2.ucla.edu (theta2.ben2.ucla.edu [164.67.131.36])	
by tomcat.ns.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01167	for <cpicket@ns.net>; 
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MIKA.oac.ucla.edu (mika.oac.ucla.edu [128.97.62.146])	
by theta2.ben2.ucla.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA21394	for <cpicket@ns.net>; 
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:58:03 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980212105536.00b4fb44@caviar.mic.ucla.edu>
X-Sender: abuse@caviar.mic.ucla.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:55:36 -0800
To: Chris Pickett <cpicket@ns.net> (by way of Chris Thomas <CThomas@ucla.edu>)
From: "Bonnie R. Mika" <abuse@ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Email Spam, 3rd in 1 week: Young Hot Girls New Site
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980208160601.007c0100@pop.ben2.ucla.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-UIDL: e27f54349d2217c3890ecb258de76ce9

Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention.  We certainly do
not condone this activity and spamming is definitely against the UCLA
Office of Academic Computing's Acceptable Use Policy. 

Unfortunately the ucla.edu address is a forged address and is not valid at
UCLA.  This email did not originate at UCLA. This has been reported to the
ISPs from where this may have originated. 

Although we prefer to respond to each incident reported to abuse@ucla.edu
personally, we have received so many complaints regarding this concern that
we have no choice but to reply with this form letter.  

Once again, please be aware that the Reply To on this mail is forged and is
not a valid UCLA email account.

Thank you,
Bonnie Mika
UCLA Office of Academic Computing

 At 04:06 PM 2/8/98 -0800, you wrote:
>This is consistent with my ZERO TOLERANCE policy on spam.
>
>This is the third time this week these porno pushers have invaded my 
>email box. They need to be stopped.
>
>The saga of these spammers can be found at:
>http://www.studio42.com/kill-the-spam/1998/reports/younghot.html
>This also includes kills and actions.
>
>CompuServe and UCLA:
>Your informationwas forged into these headers.
>
>Netcom:
>You are providing connectivity to these pornographers. It also appears 
>they are originating spam via a Netcom dial-up and hijacking a 
>third-party server. Terminate this customers.
>
>Microframe:
>These pornographers have seems to know that security is low during the 
>weekends and are taking advantage of this situation. This is TWICE now 
>they've hijacked your server.
>
>Return-Path: <foupe@compuserve.com>
>Received: from mail.microframe.com (prost.microframe.com 
>[199.125.171.8])	by tomcat.ns.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id 
>OAA25010	for <cpicket@ns.net>; Sun, 8 Feb 1998 14:30:04 -0800 (PST)
>Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 14:30:04 -0800 (PST)
>From: foupe@compuserve.com
>Received: from whx-ca3-16.IX.netcom.com by mail.microframe.com with SMTP 
>(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49)	id 
>1H4285MX; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 22:28:36 -0800
>To: foupe@compuserve.com
>Comments: Authenticated sender is <foupe@compuserve.com>
>Reply-to: susan@ucla.edu
>Subject: Young Hot Girls New Site
>Message-Id: <199802072892JAA25506@post.125.171.125>
>X-UIDL: 8ce7e40d60b7c9cf36f8c286d355d4f2
>
>>>Young Hot Girls New Site
>
>Can you handle 2 young, hot, sexy girls? Cum watch us at:
>http://www.livewhorehouse.com
>
>Where you can complete our menage-a-trois.
>We really hate it when you don't cum.
>
>
>Luv
>Nadia and Alexa
>XOXOXOXOXOXO
>
>
>
>
>======================================
>WE HONOR ALL REMOVE REQUESTS!! JUST MAIL YOUR REQUESTS TO:
>jackpotx@ix.netcom.com
>======================================
>
>
>