Return-Path: <abuse@ucla.edu>
Received: from theta2.ben2.ucla.edu (theta2.ben2.ucla.edu [164.67.131.36])	
by tomcat.ns.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01169	for <cpicket@ns.net>; 
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MIKA.oac.ucla.edu (mika.oac.ucla.edu [128.97.62.146])	
by theta2.ben2.ucla.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA21400	for <cpicket@ns.net>; 
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:58:03 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980212105533.00b53e4c@caviar.mic.ucla.edu>
X-Sender: abuse@caviar.mic.ucla.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:55:33 -0800
To: Chris Pickett <cpicket@ns.net> (by way of Chris Thomas <CThomas@ucla.edu>)
From: "Bonnie R. Mika" <abuse@ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Email Spam: Young Hot Girls New Site
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980208062359.007cc300@pop.ben2.ucla.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-UIDL: bb38d0cc7d0374dfe6b449d94e2a0070

Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention.  We certainly do
not condone this activity and spamming is definitely against the UCLA
Office of Academic Computing's Acceptable Use Policy. 

Unfortunately the ucla.edu address is a forged address and is not valid at
UCLA.  This email did not originate at UCLA. This has been reported to the
ISPs from where this may have originated. 

Although we prefer to respond to each incident reported to abuse@ucla.edu
personally, we have received so many complaints regarding this concern that
we have no choice but to reply with this form letter.  

Once again, please be aware that the Reply To on this mail is forged and is
not a valid UCLA email account.

Thank you,
Bonnie Mika
UCLA Office of Academic Computing

 At 06:23 AM 2/8/98 -0800, you wrote:
>This is consistent with my ZERO TOLERANCE policy on spam.
>
>Just for your information, those responsible for previous spams by these 
>porn pushers have disabled the web site and terminated their accounts.
>
>Netcom:
>You host this site. You also own the netblock and IP address of this web 
>site. I also suspect these spammers are originating spam from your 
>service. They are also using a Netcom drop box for bogus remove requests.
>
>CompuServe and UCLA.EDU
>Forgeries in case you want to look into it.
>
>Microframe:
>This spammer chose to hijack your server to relay out this porno spam. 
>Please secure your server from such future attacks..
>
>
>Return-Path: <foupe@compuserve.com>
>Received: from mail.microframe.com (prost.microframe.com 
>[199.125.171.8])	by tomcat.ns.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id 
>XAA05736	for <cpicket@tomcat.ns.net>; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 23:22:06 -0800 (PST)
>Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 23:22:06 -0800 (PST)
>From: foupe@compuserve.com
>Received: from whx-ca3-16.IX.netcom.com by mail.microframe.com with SMTP 
>(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49)	id 
>1H4285M4; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 22:28:32 -0800
>To: foupe@compuserve.com
>Comments: Authenticated sender is <foupe@compuserve.com>
>Reply-to: susan@ucla.edu
>Subject: Young Hot Girls New Site
>Message-Id: <199802071574XAA53840@post.125.171.125>
>X-UIDL: e605e3d2ab3afcd980ece91e0e40e9e2
>
>>>Young Hot Girls New Site
>
>Can you handle 2 young, hot, sexy girls? Cum watch us at:
>http://www.livewhorehouse.com
>
>Where you can complete our menage-a-trois.
>We really hate it when you don't cum.
>
>
>Luv
>Nadia and Alexa
>XOXOXOXOXOXO
>
>
>
>
>======================================
>WE HONOR ALL REMOVE REQUESTS!! JUST MAIL YOUR REQUESTS TO:
>jackpotx@ix.netcom.com
>=====================================
>
>
>